[①]赵一民.国际私法案例教程［M］.:知识产权出版社,2005:304.（涉外婚姻管辖权定义）.

[②]杜焕芳.《中国法院涉外管辖权实证研究》.法学家[J].2007年第2期.第152-160页.

[③]汤维建.美国民事诉讼规则［M］.北京：中国检察出版社,2003:24.

[④]曾 涛.海牙《承认离婚与法律别居公约》述评——兼论中国加入的可行性研究,北大法律信息网,最后访问日期：2009-4-20.

[⑤]Wendy Kennett. Current Developments: Private International Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol.48, 1999, P469.

[⑥]Council Regulation（EC）NO2201/2003 of 27 November 2003, Official

Journal of the European Communities, L338，23/12/2003,P1.

[⑦]欧福永.英国民商事管辖权制度研究［M］.北京：法律出版社,2005:247.

[⑧]刘卫翔.欧洲联盟国际私法[M].北京：法律出版社,2001:307.

[⑨]李旺.国际诉讼竞合[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社, 2002:43.

Study on The Divorce Jurisdiction of Foreign Related Case

Abstract: With the development of reform and open policy of China, foreign related marriage has become an indispensable force in the marriage condition of China. But for the differences in the culture background and the language for communication, foreign related marriage becomes more unstable, the case for divorce grows rapidly. The foreign related divorce jurisdiction is the foundation and prerequisite for relieving the foreign related marriage. It is the same with domestic jurisdiction, there are conflicts between the foreign related divorce jurisdictions. The purpose of this paper is to draw lessons from the international rules, such as doctrine of forum non convenience and doctrine of first accepted to solve the divorce jurisdiction of foreign related case. In this way, to make the legal system of foreign related divorce jurisdiction more perfect 、definite and practicable.

Key words: Foreign Related Marriage; Jurisdiction; Divorce Jurisdiction